• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

I Like Kill Nerds

The blog of Australian Front End / Aurelia Javascript Developer & brewing aficionado Dwayne Charrington // Aurelia.io Core Team member.

  • Home
  • Aurelia 2
  • Aurelia 1
  • About
  • Aurelia 2 Consulting/Freelance Work

Can Photoshop CS5 Remove iStockPhoto Watermarks?

General · April 22, 2010

When the amazing content-aware fill feature was announced a little while before CS5’s impending launch the first thought that came to mind was, “Am I going to be able to remove watermarks from iStockPhoto images with it?” So when a copy of Photoshop CS5 recently fell into my lap, I decided to test this theory out.

Below are images with both the watermark and watermarks removed from the images, no more than 3 or so minutes was spent on the images. I’m sure with a little bit of time spent on using the tool carefully, you would get a much better result.

Test 1: Remove a watermark from a strawberry

The watermarked iStockPhoto image (untouched)

The same image with it's watermark removed using Content-Aware Fill

Test 2: Remove a watermark from a cartoon forest

The watermarked iStockPhoto image (untouched)

The same image with it's watermark removed using Content-Aware Fill

Test 3: Remove a watermark from a paper duck hunter

The watermarked iStockPhoto image (untouched)

The same image with it's watermark removed using Content-Aware Fill

Test 4: Remove a watermark from 2 business men with buckets on their heads in a field

The watermarked iStockPhoto image (untouched)

The same image with it's watermark removed using Content-Aware Fill

 

Conclusion

Yes, you can remove watermarks from iStockPhoto images and I assume a few others. BigStockPhoto seems to be the hardest of them all in my opinion, most image watermarks on BigStockPhoto images I attempted to remove failed miserably.

It appears as though Content-Aware fill struggles on small resolution images with complex textured backgrounds (like the paper duck hunters eccentric t-shirt). But as you can see, most of the images came out looking pretty good, although some artefacts are still visible, you can probably clean them up. This tool does most of the work for you, but isn’t the definitive solution for complex removals.

I suggest spending a little more time to remove watermarks, and you’ll get a better result. Although it appears the small size of the iStockPhoto composition images seems to make Content-Aware fill less useful, larger watermarked images might be easier.

Dwayne

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
azus
azus
12 years ago

You can do it much better with GIMP… Search on.

0
superdefective
superdefective
10 years ago

Watermarks are on stock for a reason. People make a living on their stock photos and artwork. Oh.. and removing the mark and using the image afterward is illegal.

1
Force
Force
10 years ago

It’s not illegal, you fucking idiot.

0
Poepsak
Poepsak
10 years ago

What is a photo if not just a bunch of pixles with color? Now how can you want to put a watermark on there and want people to pay for it?

0
Luke
Luke
10 years ago

I too am guilty of removing the old iStock watermark before I show concepts to a client. How can you get a good idea of how a design will look when the biggest words aren’t yours!

As for it being illegal… I always end up buying the hi-res image before sending it to print anyway, it would look horrible if you didn’t.

Oh and try out dreamstime. Their comp images are about 5 times bigger and they’re images are cheaper too.

0
Dwayne
Dwayne
Author
10 years ago

Luke,

I definitely agree. Are you going to give a concept to a client with ugly watermarks over the top of the images? I’m sure everyone is guilty of removing a watermark or two in their career. As long as you don’t pass off the image as the final result and buy the image there is definitely no harm in doing it.

Dreamstime definitely have cheaper images, their watermarks are slightly harder to remove as well because of that swirl but the images are bigger you just have to sometimes dig to find something good there. I’d rather dig than pay twice as much on iStockPhoto though.

0

Primary Sidebar

Popular

  • Testing Event Listeners In Jest (Without Using A Library)
  • How To Get The Hash of A File In Node.js
  • Thoughts on the Flipper Zero
  • Waiting for an Element to Exist With JavaScript
  • How To Paginate An Array In Javascript
  • How To Get Last 4 Digits of A Credit Card Number in Javascript
  • How to Use Neural DSP Archetype Plugins With the Quad Cortex
  • How to Copy Files Using the Copy Webpack Plugin (without copying the entire folder structure)
  • NBN Box Installed Inside of Garage, Where Do You Put The Modem?
  • How To Mock uuid In Jest

Recent Comments

  • Kevmeister68 on Start-Ups and Companies That Embrace Work From Anywhere Will Be More Likely to Survive the Coming Recession in 2023
  • kevmeister68 on What Would Get People Back Into the Office?
  • Dwayne on PHP Will Not Die
  • Dwayne on How to Create a Blockchain With TypeScript
  • kevmeister68 on PHP Will Not Die

Copyright © 2023 · Dwayne Charrington · Log in

wpDiscuz