In case you missed it, Australia is currently trying to introduce a media bargaining code forcing Facebook, Google and presumably any other company that links to news to pay money to media organisations.
It’s as crazy as it sounds.
Google has recently said that if the code were approved in its current form, it would pull search out of Australia. Some think Google might be bluffing, but I assure you that they are not. If they’re willing to go on the record, they will make good on their threat.
This poses the question, if Bing or DuckDuckGo were to become the likely alternatives, would Microsoft (owner of Bing) or DuckDuckGo cave into the government’s demands and pay news companies?
The issues that I have with the code are the precedent it would set. Where do we draw the line and open up the flood gates for other content producers and providers to make the same demands that search engines and media companies pay for linking to other types of content?
I’m not a lawyer, but I know what a precedent is. This would set what I think is a dangerous precedent in its current form. Think beyond Australia, and this would be rolled out to other countries as empowered news organisations go on a feeding frenzy.
When you think about how Google works, they are linking to news sites from organisations who were forced to go online after the internet killed their traditional print distribution.
The only losers in this situation are Australian internet users. I seriously doubt Bing or DuckDuckGo will commit to paying news organisations any money. This code isn’t about playing fair, this code is retaliation from media organisations who had their businesses severed by the internet and are now looking for retaliation by taking out the biggest players.
If we want to do what is fair, let’s make multinationals pay their fair share of tax, including News Corp who receive millions in grants, bu have paid zero tax. News Corp are the most likely beneficiaries of this proposed code anyway.